A concerning revelation has emerged: every state Kamala Harris won in the 2024 election — plus Washington, D.C. — does not require a photo ID for voter registration. This has raised serious questions about election security, with some worried about the potential for fraud and illegitimate votes amid a sharply divided political landscape.
States Won by Kamala Harris and Their Loopholes
Here is the list of the 19 states and Washington, D.C., where Kamala Harris secured victories, each allowing voter registration without photo ID:
1. California
2. Colorado
3. Connecticut
4. Delaware
5. Hawaii
6. Illinois
7. Maine
8. Maryland
9. Massachusetts
10. Minnesota
11. New Jersey
12. New Mexico
13. New York
14. Oregon
15. Rhode Island
16. Vermont
17. Virginia
18. Washington
19. Washington D.C.
In these states, voters can avoid the need for a photo ID by providing alternative forms of identification, such as the last four digits of a Social Security number, utility bills, bank statements, or other non-photo documents. This policy allows individuals to register without verifying their identity with a photo ID, raising concerns over election security.
No Photo ID Required for Registration
Even more troubling, in these states, no photo ID is required during the voter registration process unless it’s a first-time voter. For first-time voters, alternative forms of identification—like utility bills, bank statements, or other non-photo government documents—are accepted in place of a photo ID or the last four digits of a Social Security number. This allows individuals to register without providing a valid photo ID, creating potential security risks and vulnerabilities in the system.
The GBI Strategies Scandal: A Chilling Example of Voter Registration Fraud
Concerns about election integrity are grounded in documented cases of fraud. In 2020, GBI Strategies, a firm hired by several Democratic-aligned organizations, was caught orchestrating a fraudulent voter registration scheme that raised alarms across multiple states, particularly in Michigan. The company, which received $4.6 million from groups such as the Biden presidential campaign, the Democratic National Committee (DNC), and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC), submitted numerous fraudulent registrations, including fake names, forged signatures, and inaccurate addresses—all intended to manipulate the election.
Disturbingly, the full scale of this fraud remains hidden from the public. The FBI’s investigation, now over four years long, is still ongoing, and key documents have not been released through FOIA requests. This lack of transparency leaves critical questions unanswered: How many fraudulent registrations were submitted? How many votes were affected? The public may never know the full extent of the manipulation.
Growing Concerns: Are Our Elections Secure?
With the political divide deepening, questions about election integrity and security have become increasingly urgent. Many Americans view the election process as compromised, citing cases like the GBI Strategies scandal and the lack of ID verification as vulnerabilities in the system.
The fact that 18 states and Washington, D.C.—all won by Kamala Harris—do not require a photo ID for voter registration is troubling to critics who argue that secure elections are essential for the health of a democratic republic. Without photo ID requirements, the system may be susceptible to fraud, leaving the process vulnerable to potential manipulation.
The Need for Transparent Elections
Without 100% transparency, accountability in our political system is impossible. Trust in the system has been severely undermined by these questionable practices, and unless we demand fully transparent elections, concerns over fraud and manipulation will persist.
Conclusion: A Call for Immediate Action
The time for accountability is now. To protect the integrity of our electoral system, we must demand fair, transparent, and accountable elections. A long history of documented voter registration fraud and ongoing FBI investigations make it clear that action is essential before further damage is done to our democratic processes.
